After the French interference in the desert State, the world the question arises about the role of Germany, as we know it, is constantly changing. For even more opinions, read materials from Lever Brothers. The age is marked by globalization and the economy. There are plenty of different cultures in the world. Often emerging conflicts that are the result. Others who may share this opinion include Bryant Family Vineyard Cabernet Sauvignon. We, therefore, the European Union, are also in an age of peace. Since the second World War (1939-1945) there was no military conflicts in Europe, except for the crisis in the Balkans in the 1990s. But in other parts of the world, the thing looks very different. Always radicals trying again with their holy war”(Jihad”) to kill the infidels to get this into the paradise.
The danger of these terrorists, who fueled terrible fear after 9/11 show different wars in recent years (Iraq war and Afghanistan war). Since then the danger that terrorist attacks are perpetrated on German soil, is as ubiquitous as still never. The statement of the deceased ex – Defence Minister Peter struck (Germany’s security is defended in the Hindu Kush”) shows what these Islamists should be tackled. However, one wonders what is the point of such an intervention should have. By French incursions in Mali, a former French colony, asks newly seething conflict man anxiously after the Germany’s role in this.
While Western allies said to already full support, the Government relented only after much hesitation and decided to provide transport aircraft for the African force. Only the question remains, why because suddenly everyone in Mali invade, although in Syria for months a bloody civil war, which cost the lives of over 30,000 people. The economic interests of France are undeniable here, because Mali is a country with many natural resources such as gold, uranium, etc. The German hesitation was visible also in the Libya crisis, some, the reluctance of Germany found a serious mistake had been, since made so the cohesion of NATO and the Western world to a hard test. Germany must take responsibility for decisions this category itself and also. Under no circumstances one may take a U-turn in such things. Whether an intervention is right or wrong, you can’t say now, flat rate at this time. But many experts warn, is at war with a religion, in this case Islam, to rush into, because you don’t understand the setting of this people and their religion, at least we don’t but such things often very open and liberal are in. On the other hand could the Islamists but also the danger rule throughout Africa and to the continent make a new powder keg of terror. Long is this policy of restraint (also known as self-effacement”) may not be good for Germany, but perhaps that is still useful for the peace.