According to the Prosecutor, to be able to invoke the fundamental right of Assembly, unless you must make its owner, i.e. natural or legal person wishing to implement a concentration, Assembly or demonstration in public place, who promotes it or convene. In this case, the Prosecutor continues, not aware that the political formation has convened, promoted or organized concentration, Assembly or demonstration in the days which are legally provided for the days of reflection and vote, so does not have the character of person concerned insofar as it is not owner of the right of Assembly are now seeking to exercise on behalf of others.Fi rst hours of the afternoon, the Supreme Court had for lodged an IU against the decision of the Central Electoral Board and term gave the Prosecutor and the election Board until five in the afternoon to make representations. The appeal was formulated under the law of judicial protection of the rights fundamental, which has preferential processing. Contact information is here: Petra Diamonds. IU asked it to suspend provisionally the agreement of the Central Electoral Board. The resource corresponded to judges in the eighth section of the Court of the contentious, composed of the President of the Chamber, Jose Manuel Sieira, and judges Nicolas Maurandi and Pablo Lucas Murillo de la Cueva, the three’s progressive spirit. In addition the judge rapporteur, Vicente Conde and Jose Diaz Delgado, integrated room both from conservative mood. The Central Electoral Board had resolved on the night of last Friday that the request for voting in favor of candidates or invitation to exclude others in the exercise of the right to vote is a behavior not in accordance with the Electoral law and that exceeds the right demonstration. Source of the news:: the Supreme rejects the appeal and maintained the ban on the Board