One is about the beginning of the proportionality, has very recognized for the jurisprudence and doutrina' '. (Ibid,). The liberty of speech must, therefore, of the place ' ' whenever to place concrete at risk more valuable legal goods, as life, freedom and propriedade' '. (Ibid, p.5). Today, after judgment conviction of Scrates, we more see the reinforcement of the stimulated liberty of speech each time for a media, national how much in such a way international, that becomes an important instrument in the denunciations on corrupes, on the social injustices, in the spreading of ideas and in the contribution of clarification of the truth.
FINAL CONSIDERAES Which are the relation of the old concept of freedom and the current one? Of this relation, in accordance with Gigon, can say everything, less than it is simple! Of a side, the old texts, of the historians and the orators not less than of the philosophers, had exerted influence and always transmitted for the thought of the modern times final words of order. Another side, we need to have well clearly for us that, in the development of the modern thought, they had always participated two factors that, in the direction considered here, had not originated from the old ones. The pluralstica freedom of thought, acquired with the destruction of the theology and metaphysics, only creates the entirely different space for something From there results one of the most visible differences between what it is desirable for the old ones and for the modern. Already we speak of the difference. For old a freedom it is basically not to be dependent of nobody and thing some. This target had, always always, a decisive priority in relation to the improvement of the life conditions. In the gift, however, the opposite happens well. The programmar of the freedom only disfara the interdependence each bigger time of all in relation to that, in the interest of the improvement of the survival conditions, she is not only accepted, but also express conceived as something desirable In the Antiquity the freedom is, in first place, the autarcia that we finish to mention e, later, the cautious relation with them to be able exterior and uncontrollable circumstances, and is always ready to collect itself in that closer region of the man in which the individual, in all the cases and definitively, is Sir of itself exactly.