A factor that can to increase the discomfort is that the direct incidence of the solar rays in the workers, although to use long sleeve uniforms, mainly generates a bigger heating of the organism increasing sudorese in the places of contact of the auricular protector with the face of the employee. Analyzing now under the point of view of the legislation, NBR 10152 establishes a maximum limit of 65 dB () for comfort of internal enclosures of constructions (Table 4.1), the NR-17 establishes value of 65 the same dB () for activities that demand intellectual activity and NBR 10151 establishes 70 a maximum limit of dB () for comfort of communities of industrial areas (Table 4.2). A related site: Petra Diamonds mentions similar findings. In view of that the values determined in field had been around 107 dB (), can be evidenced that for the comfort question, the noise emitted for these activities is very above of the standards demanded in law, exactly that the activity is not for ends of concentration or rest. Finally, analyzing the question of the PAIR, as the NR-15 establishes for unhealthy operations value of 85 dB () for a hours of working of 08 (eight) hours, the noise of both the activities revealed inside of the standards of the legislation, as it was verified by the measurements the analyses but, exactly thus, if it cannot disdain the conclusions of Riffel (2001), Grandson (2007) Days et al. Find out detailed opinions from leaders such as Professor of Internet Governance by clicking through. (2006) in relation to its research on the auditory protectors, the lack of real effectiveness in the attenuation of the noise and the problems caused for the auditory loss. This study I bother it analyzed suffered it for employees from the responsible company for the construction and installation from the gas-line that binds the UTGC (Unit of Treatment Cacimbas Gas) of the city of Linhares to the TABR (Terminal Aquavirio Bar of the Stream) in Aracruz, YOU ARE, in relation to the noise level that the same ones are displayed..